 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Roberto R
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject: General Install |
|
|
Fairly new to Clustering - Some questions i am trying to find answers to
1. On each node - do you install the Exchange installation on the local
drive or on the san shared drives?
2. Recommendations for shared drives is
4 LUNS
1 lun for smtp and mta (Raid 1) 2 disks
1 lun for database (Raid 5) 3 disks
1 lun for logs (Raid 1) 2 disks
1 lun for quorum (Raid 1) 2 disks
Is a total of 9 disks correct for configuration of active/passive cluster?
Archived from group: microsoft>public>exchange>clustering |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Arnold [MVP]
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 1126
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:41 pm Post subject: Re: General Install |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:27:08 -0800, Roberto R
wrote:
>Fairly new to Clustering - Some questions i am trying to find answers to
>
>
>1. On each node - do you install the Exchange installation on the local
>drive or on the san shared drives?
Has to be on the local.
>2. Recommendations for shared drives is
>4 LUNS
>1 lun for smtp and mta (Raid 1) 2 disks
>1 lun for database (Raid 5) 3 disks
>1 lun for logs (Raid 1) 2 disks
>1 lun for quorum (Raid 1) 2 disks
>Is a total of 9 disks correct for configuration of active/passive cluster?
Disks have got nothing to do with LUNs.
Database on three disks with RAID5 is little short of insane. You
might as well just mirror them.
You're only looking at one LUN for logs? Only one store? Why on earth
cluster such a small machine? (Yes, I know that size is not related to
business criticality but there is a broad correlation) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roberto R
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:04 pm Post subject: Re: General Install |
|
|
Mark,
Thanks for the reply
What do you recommend? If i have 3 database stores and data equal to 100 gbs.
After reading http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123612.aspx
the Disk drive configuration listed in the website from microsoft.
Says 104 spindles does that mean 104 disks?
Thanks for your help!
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:27:08 -0800, Roberto R
> wrote:
>
> >Fairly new to Clustering - Some questions i am trying to find answers to
> >
> >
> >1. On each node - do you install the Exchange installation on the local
> >drive or on the san shared drives?
>
> Has to be on the local.
>
> >2. Recommendations for shared drives is
> >4 LUNS
> >1 lun for smtp and mta (Raid 1) 2 disks
> >1 lun for database (Raid 5) 3 disks
> >1 lun for logs (Raid 1) 2 disks
> >1 lun for quorum (Raid 1) 2 disks
> >Is a total of 9 disks correct for configuration of active/passive cluster?
>
> Disks have got nothing to do with LUNs.
> Database on three disks with RAID5 is little short of insane. You
> might as well just mirror them.
>
> You're only looking at one LUN for logs? Only one store? Why on earth
> cluster such a small machine? (Yes, I know that size is not related to
> business criticality but there is a broad correlation)
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Arnold [MVP]
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 1126
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:30 am Post subject: Re: General Install |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:04:00 -0800, Roberto R
wrote:
>Mark,
>
>Thanks for the reply
>
>What do you recommend? If i have 3 database stores and data equal to 100 gbs.
>
>After reading http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123612.aspx
>
>the Disk drive configuration listed in the website from microsoft.
>
>Says 104 spindles does that mean 104 disks?
>
>Thanks for your help!
>
>
>
104 spindles does indeed mean 104 disks. A disk only has one spindle
(it's the stick of metal down the middle of the disk that the platter
spins on)
However, because you're going to use hardware raid it doesn't actually
translate into actual real metalwork. The quorum, one of the logs (or
more), queues etc. will easily go on a pair of disks so the (at least
6 spindles) that mention there will end up as two real spindles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roberto R
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:28 pm Post subject: Re: General Install |
|
|
Mark,
Still a little confusing
If you look at the chart of disks it goes up to only Disk 22, in the chart
do those disks mean LUN.
For Example
SMTP/MTA drives RAID-(0+1) array consisting of four spindles. (3 EVSs × 4
disks = 12 disks.)
Does that mean i have to create 3 Raid Configurations consisting of 4 drives
for 3 Virtual Servers. Thats alot of disks dont you think?
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:04:00 -0800, Roberto R
> wrote:
>
> >Mark,
> >
> >Thanks for the reply
> >
> >What do you recommend? If i have 3 database stores and data equal to 100 gbs.
> >
> >After reading http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123612.aspx
> >
> >the Disk drive configuration listed in the website from microsoft.
> >
> >Says 104 spindles does that mean 104 disks?
> >
> >Thanks for your help!
> >
> >
> >
> 104 spindles does indeed mean 104 disks. A disk only has one spindle
> (it's the stick of metal down the middle of the disk that the platter
> spins on)
> However, because you're going to use hardware raid it doesn't actually
> translate into actual real metalwork. The quorum, one of the logs (or
> more), queues etc. will easily go on a pair of disks so the (at least
> 6 spindles) that mention there will end up as two real spindles.
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Arnold [MVP]
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 1126
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:58 pm Post subject: Re: General Install |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:28:06 -0800, Roberto R
wrote:
>Mark,
>
>Still a little confusing
>If you look at the chart of disks it goes up to only Disk 22, in the chart
>do those disks mean LUN.
>
>For Example
>SMTP/MTA drives RAID-(0+1) array consisting of four spindles. (3 EVSs × 4
>disks = 12 disks.)
>Does that mean i have to create 3 Raid Configurations consisting of 4 drives
>for 3 Virtual Servers. Thats alot of disks dont you think?
>
>
>
Why do you think you need 0+1 or even 1+0? Have you got the IO calcs
that say you should? You're over thinking this and probably
over-raiding it. If you don't have a good feel about the storage
calculator and a knowledge of how many disks you need you should get
someone in to sanity check it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Related Topics: | new install with SP2 I'm setting up a standby cluster (A/P) for Exchange 2003 at our DR site. Windows cluster is running and I have installed Exchange binaries on both nodes. But haven't created EVS and any Exchange resources yet. I'd like to apply Exchange SP2. Can I do i
general Q All, Is it possible to have a blackberry device and connect it to an ex2003 sp2 server and use the blackberry in the place of a windows mobile device? Reason i am asking is i would like to take a large department with around 100 Blackberries and get them
General Email Set up Question I have a situation where we have remote sales offices. I want to have each sales office have a unique address via a Distrubution List. That list will contain the sales reps of each office. So that when an email comes in to that office, that email will go
Hotfix general question Hi, We have a Microsoft Exchange 2003 cluster. From time to time, there may be hotfixes to be applied or a registry key to be modified (very rare, of course). It is sometimes specified in the Release Notes that the Information Store has to be restarted fo
General design questions We are running Exchange 2003 but want to add a new server into existing with Exchange 2007. Working on the design and have some quesitons. 1. Is ISA necessary? I don't use it now. We use basic for OWA. Firewall passes tra |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|