 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
MC
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: ESEUtils |
|
|
I want to defrag exchange 2003(Sp2) database with ESEUtils.exe,
does anyone know how long it may take to defrag and compact abou 50Gig data
size?
I have 2 x Quad core Cpu, 4GRam, and enough storage on server.
Archived from group: microsoft>public>exchange>tools |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Arnold [MVP]
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 1126
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:06 pm Post subject: Re: ESEUtils |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:22:32 -0500, "MC"
wrote:
>I want to defrag exchange 2003(Sp2) database with ESEUtils.exe,
>does anyone know how long it may take to defrag and compact abou 50Gig data
>size?
>I have 2 x Quad core Cpu, 4GRam, and enough storage on server.
50 gig on a box like that wouldn't take long at all. The thing is
though that you should never need to degrag that tiny store off line.
You either have another 25GB to go before you get to a limit or you're
on Enterprise edition where there isn't a limit. If you're on
Enterprise and you really want to defrag then the right way is to move
the data off to another store and then delete the one that's now
empty.
If you're only on standard you should have no need to because it'll
only grow again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Fullbright
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 5:25 pm Post subject: Re: ESEUtils |
|
|
A better question would be why? What goal are you trying to accomplish?
Shrink the physical size of the store?
If you have another exchange server in the organization or are running
enterprise, use movemailbox to a new store instead.
If you are running standard or SBS and this is the only exchange server,
then to realize space recovery you:
1. Must ensure that the store will not simply grow again. Exchange will
use whitespace in the database before increasing the size of the database.
If the store will simply grow again, reducing the physical size of the store
is a pointless exercise in counterproductivity. To ensure that the store
will not simply grow again, you need to enforce limits. Limits aren't an
arbitrary thing; work with you business units to define business objectives
and determine how much mail you need to retain to meet those business
objectives. If the mail is worth keeping, then keep it on exchange. If it
has no business value, then having it around is a liability; get rid of it.
2. After you have removed a large amount of mail (so that there is enough
whitespace that will never be reused to make the user disruption
worthwhile), you have to wait for deleted items retention to expire, then
wait for the next online maintenance cycle to complete, then wait for online
defrag to complete. At this point, you need to check the event ID 1221 to
make sure you're going to gain something before taking an outage.
3. Conservatively estimate the outage time and notify users ahead of time.
(I think this is the step you were trying to do in your original post)
4. Make sure you have a full backup and a backout plan prior to the
beginning of you announced outage window.
5. Practice the steps on a test server (in VM works, you want to validate
the steps and resolve any issues with the steps before the outage window
begins.
6. At the beginning of your outage window, execute your tested steps in
production.
"MC" wrote in message %23naIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I want to defrag exchange 2003(Sp2) database with ESEUtils.exe,
> does anyone know how long it may take to defrag and compact abou 50Gig
> data size?
> I have 2 x Quad core Cpu, 4GRam, and enough storage on server. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MC
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: Re: ESEUtils |
|
|
Intent was to reduce my exchange enterprise databases
event id 1221 shows that, my 3 databases has about 3G free space after
online defrag ended.
as you suggest, I guess no need to defrag
Thanks
MC
"John Fullbright" wrote in message @TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>A better question would be why? What goal are you trying to accomplish?
>Shrink the physical size of the store?
>
> If you have another exchange server in the organization or are running
> enterprise, use movemailbox to a new store instead.
>
> If you are running standard or SBS and this is the only exchange server,
> then to realize space recovery you:
>
> 1. Must ensure that the store will not simply grow again. Exchange will
> use whitespace in the database before increasing the size of the database.
> If the store will simply grow again, reducing the physical size of the
> store is a pointless exercise in counterproductivity. To ensure that the
> store will not simply grow again, you need to enforce limits. Limits
> aren't an arbitrary thing; work with you business units to define business
> objectives and determine how much mail you need to retain to meet those
> business objectives. If the mail is worth keeping, then keep it on
> exchange. If it has no business value, then having it around is a
> liability; get rid of it.
>
> 2. After you have removed a large amount of mail (so that there is enough
> whitespace that will never be reused to make the user disruption
> worthwhile), you have to wait for deleted items retention to expire, then
> wait for the next online maintenance cycle to complete, then wait for
> online defrag to complete. At this point, you need to check the event ID
> 1221 to make sure you're going to gain something before taking an outage.
>
> 3. Conservatively estimate the outage time and notify users ahead of
> time. (I think this is the step you were trying to do in your original
> post)
>
> 4. Make sure you have a full backup and a backout plan prior to the
> beginning of you announced outage window.
>
> 5. Practice the steps on a test server (in VM works, you want to validate
> the steps and resolve any issues with the steps before the outage window
> begins.
>
> 6. At the beginning of your outage window, execute your tested steps in
> production.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "MC" wrote in message
> %23naIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>I want to defrag exchange 2003(Sp2) database with ESEUtils.exe,
>> does anyone know how long it may take to defrag and compact abou 50Gig
>> data size?
>> I have 2 x Quad core Cpu, 4GRam, and enough storage on server.
>
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oliver Moazzezi [MVP]
Joined: 02 Oct 2007 Posts: 583
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: Re: ESEUtils |
|
|
3GB of whitespace is nothing, you will have go from 50GB to 47GB, and then
in the week following find your store starting to grow quite rapidly until
it finds itself with enough whitespace again to stay at a pretty much
contstant size (probably 48-50GB).
If you have 15-30GB+ I would have said it was worth it, if you couldn't move
mailboxes to another store that is, only for backup and restore pursposes.
Oliver
> Intent was to reduce my exchange enterprise databases
> event id 1221 shows that, my 3 databases has about 3G free space after
> online defrag ended.
> as you suggest, I guess no need to defrag
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Related Topics: | Running eseutils when running low on space I'm running low on space on the drive that my Exch Db's are installed on. Can I map a drive to a different server and run defrag to create the temp file or does it have to be the same server. What would the solution be if I can't create the temp file on m
Advantages & Disadvantages on IMAP4 Because of some IPhone users (one of them is my boss), I may have to enable IMAP4 on my exchange server, but I am not sure what disadvantages I may have by enabling IMAP4. If there are more security risks and also it slows down the server I
Exchange 2000 Outlook 2007 Hi, I am in the proccess of evaluating windows vista business version and microsoft office 2007. I currently run microsoft windows 2k with outlook 2k3 and I have no problems. I connect to to a remote network and start my checkpoint vpn client. I can ping
Recover exchange with edb files only Hi, I need to restore an old exchange server but I don't have a working backup, I only have the edb files. The domain is in-tact, in fact I am trying to restore to a DC from the old domain (I have re-claimed all roles back to it). I have got the database
Exchange 2003 + SAN + Raid5 or 10 Folks Which RAID config Raid 5 or 10 will give Exchange the best performance. My SAN guys are saying Raid 10 for our log drives and raid 5 for our DB drives. Is this documented anywhere??? Thanks again |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|