exchangefreaks.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Bridges

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    exchangefreaks.com Forum Index -> MS Exchange 2000 Admin
Author Message
Patrick Whittle



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:26 pm    Post subject: Bridges Reply with quote

Can anyone answer this?


> Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?


Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?

Archived from group: microsoft>public>exchange2000>admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kevin Longley



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Bridges Reply with quote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_bridge

"Patrick Whittle" wrote in message @TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Can anyone answer this?
>
>
>> Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?
>
>
> Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
> TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roger Abell [MVP]



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:50 am    Post subject: Re: Bridges Reply with quote

Yes, traditionally the term bridge was used for protocol
transitioning devices, and we see much less of these now.
But for example, IP does not work for deep space, so how
would you transition telemetry onto local storage network?

"Patrick Whittle" wrote in message @TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Can anyone answer this?
>
>
>> Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?
>
>
> Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
> TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Arnold [MVP]



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 1126

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Bridges Reply with quote

Bridges are like so totally last year. You can like tunnel everything
now and it looks so much better from an aesthetic point of view. Like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Whittle



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Bridges Reply with quote

Good point. Ever since the DEW system became legacy, NASA must be using
something else.

"Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote in message
news:%23oRadZdSIHA.2000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Yes, traditionally the term bridge was used for protocol
> transitioning devices, and we see much less of these now.
> But for example, IP does not work for deep space, so how
> would you transition telemetry onto local storage network?
>
> "Patrick Whittle" wrote in message
> @TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Can anyone answer this?
>>
>>
>>> Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?
>>
>>
>> Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
>> TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
X.400 and Exchange 2000 Dear experts, I continue to have a problem in a Mixed mode Exch 5.5 and Exch 2000 sending a message to a user with no SMTP address, just X.400. The message is rejected. Here is the Scenario: W2K Forest with 3 domains. All domains are conected with the R

We are unable to receive any mails Hi, I have a problem with Windows 2000 Exchange server for passed two days. We are unable to receive any mails from other domain and internal mails. And we are getting the following Error in Event Viewer Source MSExchangeMTA time service Ty

Exchange Connector Hello I have exchange 2000, one of our users has a Comcast email he added it to his outlook along with the company's email, when trying to send emails using Comcast account, he gets "SMTP" error. do we have to configure SMTP connector and Virtual Server.

SMTP Relay Setup Does anyone know of any good tutorials on setting up a smtp server in the following situation. I think i have my setup right and i want to see what i may have done wrong I have one server that i use for inbound mail filtering for spam (WEBSERVER) and av a

Allow Only Certain Netblocks I have a customer who has an external SPAM filtering company (Their MX records point to that filtering service). I want to lock down the Exchange server to *ONLY* accept mail from the filtering companies netblocks. All I could find is the Allow/Deny IP ad
Post new topic   Reply to topic    exchangefreaks.com Forum Index -> MS Exchange 2000 Admin All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group